ANALISIS BUTIR SOAL KONSEP DASAR IPA 1 MELALUI PENGGUNAAN PROGRAM KOMPUTER ANATES VERSI 4.0 FOR WINDOWS

Authors

  • Mahmud Alpusari Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Universitas Riau, Pekanbaru, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/

Keywords:

Konsep Dasar IPA 1, validity, distinguishing items, level of difficulity

Abstract

This research was qualitative research with descriptive method. Subject was student teachers who took Fundamental Science 1. Based on validity analysis of item on 1 % significance level, there were 16 valid items, 26 valid ietms for 5 % significance level, and 14 invalid items. Then, analysis of distinguishing items, the item number 20 was very worst, 15 items were poor, other 15 item were fair and the other items were good. Meanwhile, analysis of level of difficulty, 17 item were very easy, 9 items were easy, 11 items were moderate, an item was difficult, and the others were very difficult. Analysis for whole items, there were only 21 items that were ready to be used, 5 items were needed to be revised, and the others could not be used in a test.

References

Karno To. (2003) Mengenal Analisis Tes. Bandung: UPI

Purwanto. (2011) Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Sudjana dan Ibrahim. (2004). Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo

Sudijono. (2006). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Suharsimi Arikunto. (2005). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Penerbit Bumi Aksara

Suherman, Erman dan Sukjaya,Yaya. (1990). Petunjuk Praktis untuk Melaksanakan Evaluasi Pendidikan Matematika. Bandung: Wijayakusumah.

Surapranata. (2009). Analisis, Validitas, Reliabilitas dan Interpretasi Hasil Tes Implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Published

2014-10-25

Issue

Section

Original research

How to Cite

ANALISIS BUTIR SOAL KONSEP DASAR IPA 1 MELALUI PENGGUNAAN PROGRAM KOMPUTER ANATES VERSI 4.0 FOR WINDOWS. (2014). Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 3(2), 106-115. https://doi.org/10.33578/

Most read articles by the same author(s)