TEACHER COMPETENCY IN DEVELOPING SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTRUMENTS IN SDIT AL-FITYAN SOMBA OPU DISTRICTS, GOWA DISTRICT

Authors

  • Mirnawati Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia Author
  • Nursalam Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia Author
  • M. Basri Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v10i2.7865

Keywords:

Education Quality, Teacher Competence, Assessment Instruments

Abstract

This study aims to describe teachers' ability to determine the supporting and inhibiting factors of teacher competence in the preparation of assessment instruments for social studies subjects. The type of research used is qualitative research through a descriptive approach, with the sample determined by purposive sampling consisting of the principal, teachers in grades III and VI, and students in grades III and VI. This study concluded that teachers who taught already had good pedagogical competencies in the preparation of assessment instruments. Furthermore, the increase in pedagogical competence was supported by several supporting factors, namely: (1) high level of education; (2) participation in various training and scientific activities; (3) length of service and work experience; (4) level of welfare; (5) awareness of obligations and responsibilities; (6) availability of facilities and infrastructure; (7) principal leadership; and (8) guidance activities undertaken. The inhibiting factor for teacher pedagogical competence was the lack of understanding of the 2013 curriculum assessment.

References

Ainin, M. (2006). Evaluasi dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Malang: Misykat.

Alwasilah, A. C., et al. (1996). Glossary of educational assessment terms. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.

Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. (2004). Evaluasi program pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Convelo, G., & Cevilla, dkk. (1993). Pengantar metode penelitian. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia.

Depdiknas. (2003). Kurikulum 2004: Pedoman penilaian kelas. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Depdiknas. (2005). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia No. 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Depdiknas. (2007). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2007 tentang Standar Kualifikasi Akademik dan Kompetensi Guru. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Djohar. (2006). Guru, pendidikan dan pembinaannya: Penerapannya dalam pendidikan dan Undang-Undang Guru. Yogyakarta: CV Grafika Indah.

Hamalik, O. (2001). Kurikulum dan pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Jarolimek, J. (1993). Social studies in elementary education. New York: Macmillan Publishing.

Kumano, Y. (2001). Authentic assessment and portfolio assessment: Its theory and practice. Shizuoka: Shizuoka University.

Kunandar. (2007). Guru profesional. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Kunandar. (2015). Penilaian autentik (Penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013). Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Mardalis. (1999). Metode penelitian: Suatu pendekatan proposal. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Mirnawati, N., Nursalam, & M. Basri. (2021). Mutu pendidikan, kompetensi guru, dan instrumen penilaian. PRIMARY: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 10(2), 464.

Moleong, L. J. (2013). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metode penelitian kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Munif, C. (2009). Sekolahnya manusia: Sekolah berbasis multiple intelligences di Indonesia. Bandung: Kaifa.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2010). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sumarna, S., & Hatta, M. (2006). Penilaian portofolio implementasi Kurikulum 2004. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suprihatiningrum, J. (2016). Guru profesional: Pedoman kinerja, kualifikasi, dan kompetensi guru. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.

Surya, M. (2005). Perlindungan profesi guru: Kode etik dan Undang-Undang Guru. Bandung: UPI.

Syah, M. (2004). Psikologi pendidikan dengan pendekatan baru. Jakarta: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tayibnapis, F. Y. (2000). Evaluasi program. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Uno, H. B. (2007). Profesi kependidikan: Problema, solusi, dan reformasi pendidikan di Indonesia (Edisi 1, Cet. 1). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Widaningsih, D. (2011). Perencanaan pembelajaran. Tasikmalaya: Rizqi Press.

Yusuf, M. (2017). Assessment dan evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Zainul, A., & Nasution. (2001). Penilaian hasil belajar. Jakarta: Pakar Raya Jakarta.

Published

2021-04-18

Issue

Section

Original research

How to Cite

TEACHER COMPETENCY IN DEVELOPING SOCIAL SCIENCES INSTRUMENTS IN SDIT AL-FITYAN SOMBA OPU DISTRICTS, GOWA DISTRICT. (2021). Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 10(2), 450-464. https://doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v10i2.7865

Most read articles by the same author(s)