TEACHERS’ OBSTACLES IN ASSESSING STUDENTS’ ATTITUDES DURING THE ONLINE LEARNING PROCESS BASED ON THE CURRICULUM OF 2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v12i2.9297Keywords:
teacher obstacle, attitude assessment, online learning, curriculum of 2013Abstract
This paper discusses the teachers’ obstacles in giving attitude assessments to students from home. In addition, this paper also discusses the impact that is accused regarding the obstacle in giving attitude assessment to students and knows the solution that is used by the teacher to resolve the obstacle in giving attitude assessment. The research method used is a qualitative descriptive approach. The data collection used is an interview method. The research subject is the teachers at State Elementary School of Pelas 01 who are applying K-13 in classes 1 to 6. The research finding is that the teachers had obstacles during the learning process based on K-13. The obstacles faced by the teachers at State Elementary School ofPelas 01 who use K-13 are that the students had been late in collecting the tasks, students had not allowed Zoom Meetings, and students had not responded to their teachers. The impact of obstacles implies that teachers cannot assess the attitude through discipline, honesty, responsibility, and politeness to students. Thus, the teacher takes action to overcome these issues.
References
Banks, J. A. (2016). Education and Curriculum Multikultural Transformation. Journal of Negro Education
Multikultural, 64(4), 390-400.
Calhoun, J.F dan Accolia, J.R. (1978).Psychology Of Adjustment and HumanRelationships. New York: Random House.
Elmubarok, Z. (2009). Menumbuhkan Pendidikan Nilai. Bandung: Alfabet, cv.
Elyas, H.A. (2018). Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran E Learning dalam Kualitas Pembelajaran. Jurnal Warta, 56, 1829-7463. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i56.4
Fadillah, M. (2012). Desain Pembelajaran PAUD. Jogyakarta: AR RuzzMedia.
Fussalam, Y. E. (2018). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 (K13) SMP Negeri 2 Sarolangun. Jurnal Muara Pendidikan, 3(1), 45-55.
Given, S. M. (2010). Using Affective Assesment To Understan Student Identity (As reader and Non Reader). The Jounal Of Virginia Community College, 15 (1). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ881561.pdf
Gulikers, J.T.M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirshner, P. A. (2006). Authentic assessment, studentand teacher perceptions: the practical value of the five dimensional- framework. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 58, 337-357. DOI:10.1080/13636820600955443
Handayani, R., Arif, M., & Syam, A. (2020). Pembelajaran Daring Pada Anak Usia Sekolah Dasar Masa Pendemi Covid-19 Di Kecamatan Pauh Kota Padang. Jurnal Kepemimpinan Dan Pengurusan Sekolah, 5(2), 107-114. DOI: 10.34125/kp.v5i2.516
Kemendikbud.(2013). Permendikbud No.54 Tentang Standart Kompetensi Lulusan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
https://luk.staff.ugm.ac.id/atur/bsnp/Permendikbud54-2013SKL.pdf
Kurniawati, D., & Marwadi. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Gotong Royong dalam Pembelajaran Tematik di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 640-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i3.387
Mawaddah, M., Putri, R. M., Rambe, A. H., Siregar, S. R. A., & Ananda, F. (2022). Kendala Guru Sekolah Dasar Dalam Memberikan Penilaian Sikap Siswa Pada Proses Pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling (JPDK), 4(4), 680-685. https://doi.org/10.31004/jpdk.v4i4.5301
Menteri Pendidikan. (2020).Surat Edaran Nomor 3 Tahun 2020 Tentang Pelaksanaan Pendidikan dalam Masa Darurat Corona Virus (COVID-19). Mulyasa. (2013). Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.
Moleog, L. J. (2014). Metodelogi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Karya.
Nugroho, A. S., & Mawardi. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Tanggung Jawab dalam
Pembelajaran Tematik di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(2), 808-817. DOI:https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i3.387
Nuh, K. (2013). Implementasi Kurikulum. Bandung : Alpabeta.
Nuriana, D. (2018). Kendala Guru Dalam Memberikan Penilaian Sikap Siswa Pada Proses Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013. Journal of Islamic Elementary School, 2(2), 51-62. DOI:10.21070/madrosatuna.v2i2.1970
Oetomo, H. (2012). Pendoman Dasar Pendidikan Budi Pekerti. Jakarta: PT Prestasi Pustakarya Pannen, P. (1999). Pengertian Sistem Pendidikan Terbuka dan Jarak Jauh. Jakarta:Universitas Terbuka.
Puskur.(2007). Gagasan Kurikulum Masa Depan. Jakarta: Balitbang Puskur Depdiknas.
Rusmawan, A. D. (2015). Kendala Guru Sekolah Dasar Dalam Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Cakrawala
Pendidikan.
Rimland, E. (2013). “Assesing affective Learning Using Student Respon System. Libraries & The Academy, 13 (4). DOI:10.1353/pla.2013.0037.
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Suryobroto. (2005). Tatalaksana Kurikulum. Jakarta : Rineka Cipta.
Tiara, S. K., & Sari, E. Y. (2019). Analisis teknik penilaian sikap sosial siswa dalam penerapan kurikulum 2013 di SDN 1 Watulimo. EduHumaniora| Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 11(1), 21-25. https://scholar.archive.org/work/iyf3igjab5divpcqiu27gi42zm/access/wayback/https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/eduhumaniora/article/download/11905/pdf
Wiyoto, A. (2010). Melatih Anak Bertanggung Jawab. Jakarta: Mitra Utama.
Yunianto. A. R. (2015). Implementasi E Learning Berbabis Kelase Sebagai Sumber Belajar. Skripsi. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Zuriah, N. (2007). Pendidikan Moral dan Budi Pekerti Dalam Prespektif Perubahan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Zuriah, N. (2008). Pendidikan Moral dan Budi Pekerti Dalam Prespektif Perubahan Mengagas Platform Pendidikan Budi Pekerti Secara Kontektual dan Furistik. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Licence
Copyright @2017. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial used, distribution and reproduction in any medium
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.