DEVELOPMENT OF THE 6Cs EMERGENCE MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS IN  ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS

Poppy Anggraeni; Dadang Sunendar; Bunyamin Maftuh; Wahyu Sopandi

doi:10.33578/jpfkip.v12i4.9777

Authors

Poppy Anggraeni Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia , Indonesia Author
Dadang Sunendar Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia, Indonesia Author
Bunyamin Maftuh Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia, Indonesia Author
Wahyu Sopandi Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia , Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v12i4.9777

Keywords:

instrument validity and copyright, 6Cs, elementary school

Abstract

The instrument for measuring the emergence of 6Cs in learning at elementary schools is an instrument developed to measure the emergence of character, critical thinking, creativity, citizenship, collaboration, and communication in learning planning and learning implementation at elementary schools. The purpose of the research in this paper is to analyze the instrument validity that has been developed to measure the emergence of 6Cs in learning planning and implementation at elementary schools and to describe the copyrighting of a validated instrument. The research method uses the Research and Development of the ADDIE model, which consists of analyzing, designing, developing, implementing, and evaluating stages. Instrument validation was carried out by four experts. Instruments that have been validated were subsequently revised based on the suggestions for improvement and calculated the validity percentage and validity level. The results indicate that the instrument for measuring the emergence of 6Cs in learning planning at elementary schools had a validity percentage of 97.74% with a very valid validity level. The instrument for measuring the emergence of 6Cs in learning implementation at elementary schools had a validity percentage of 94.41% with a level very valid validity likewise. The results of the validation and this instrument copyright can be a reference to measure the quality of learning planning and implementation so that it can improve the learning quality in elementary schools, especially related to the learning that can facilitate the development of 6Cs.

References

Akbar, S. (2016). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaraan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Akib, E., & Muhsin, M. A. (2019). Assessment of Teaching in 21ST Century. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1179(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-

6596/1179/1/012065

Alberta Education. (2016). Descriptions & Indicators alberta gov. Government of

Alberta.https://education.alberta.ca/c ompetencies/descriptions

indicators/everyone/descriptions

indicators/

Anggraeni, P., Sunendar, D., Maftuh, B., Sopandi, W., & Puspita, R. D. (2023). What do elementary school teachers think about digitalization at school? Jurnal Mimbar Ilmu, 27(1), 1–10.

https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.12.2022 .e605

Anggraeni, P., Sunendar, D., Maftuh, B., Sopandi, W., & Puspita, R. D. (2022). Why 6 Cs ? The Urgency of Learning at Elementary School. International Conference on

Educational Development and Quality Assurance (ICED-QA 4), 650, 35–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2991

/assehr.k.220303.008

Bell, D. V. J. (2016). Twenty-first century education: Transformative education for sustainability and responsible citizenship. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes 2016-0004

Berk, R. A. (2013). Top five flashpoints in the assessment of teaching effectiveness. Medical Teacher, 35(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.20

12.732247

Berk, R. A. (2018). Berk’s Law: Start Spreading the News--Use Multiple Sources of Evidence to Evaluate Teaching. Journal of Faculty Development, 32(1), 73–81.

Bialik, M., Martin, J., Mayo, M., & Trilling, B. (2016). Evolving Assessments for a 21st Century Education. . Argosy foundation. OAK Foundation. https://curriculumredesign.org.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Approach, Instructional Design: The ADDIE. In Department of Educational Psychology and Instructional Technology University of Georgia (Vol. 53, Issue 9).

Cachia, R., & Ferrari, A. (2010). Creativity in Schools : A Survey of Teachers in Europe.

https://doi.org/10.2791/48818

Carlgren, T. (2013). Communication , Critical Thinking , Problem Solving : A Suggested Course for All High School Students. Interchange, 44, 63–81.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-013- 9197-8

Chappuis, S., & Stiggins, J. R. (2002). Freemasonry in Egypt 1798-1921: A study in cultural and political

encounters. British Society for Middle Eastern Studies. Bulletin, 16(1), 40–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13530198908

705494

Chowdhury, M. (2016). Emphasizing morals , values , ethics , and character education in science education and science teaching. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 4(2), 1–16.

Collard, P., & Looney, J. (2014). Nurturing Creativity in Education. European Journal of Education, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12090

Fitriani, D., Suryana, Y., & Hamdu, G. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Higher-Order Thinking Skill pada Pembelajaran Tematik Berbasis Outdoor Learning di Sekolah Dasar Kelas IV. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 2(1), 87. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v2i1.13

752

Fullan, M., & Scott, G. (2014). New Pedagogies for Deep Learning Whitepaper: Education Plus. Collaborative Impact. www.newpedagogies.org

Goodyear, P. (2015). Teaching as design. HERDSA Review of Higher Education Volume 2, 2, 27–50. http://www.herdsa.org.au/wp

content/uploads/HERDSARHE2015v 02p27.pdf

Heitink, M. C., Van der Kleij, F. M., Veldkamp, B. P., Schildkamp, K., & Kippers, W. B. (2016). A systematic review of prerequisites for implementing assessment for learning in classroom practice. Educational Research Review, 17, 50–62.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015 .12.002

Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing Creativity and Technology in 21st Century Education : A Systemic View for Change. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 27–37.

Jannah, I., & Rahayu, P. (2022). Uji Validitas Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Analogi Siswa. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5571 9/jrpm.v4i1.378

Jha, A. (2020). Predictors of Teaching Learning Process. American Journal of Educational Research, 8(9), 685– 692.

https://doi.org/10.12691/education-8- 9-10

Jones, C. A., Watkins, F. S., Williams, J., Lambros, A., Callahan, K. E., Lawlor, J., Williamson, J. D., High, K. P., & Atkinson, H. H. (2019). A 360-degree assessment of teaching effectiveness using a structured videorecorded observed teaching exercise for faculty development. Medical Education Online, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.20

19.1596708

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Permendikbudristek Nomor 16 Tahun 2022 Tentang Standar Proses Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah.

Kuntoro, B. T., & Fajrie, N. (2023). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian sikap sosial menggunakan skala likert untuk siswa sekolah dasar. Journal Tunas Bangsa, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4624 4/tunasbangsa.v10i1.2047

Lin, A. (2013). Citizenship education in American schools and its role in

developing civic engagement : a review of the research. Educational Review, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/

00131911.2013.813440

Mansyur, Rasyid, H., & Suratno. (2015). Asesmen Pembelajaran di Sekolah : Panduan bagi Guru dan Calon Guru. Yogyakarta Pustaka Pelajar.

Maulida, I., Dibia, I. K., & Astawan, I. G. (2020). The Development of Social Attitude Assessment Instrument and Social Studies Learning Outcomes Grade IV on Theme of Indahnya Keragaman di Negeriku. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v3i2.25

823

Miller, B. S. (2015). The 6 C’s Squared Version of Education in the 21st Century. Accretive Media. https://www.bamradionetwork.com.

Mudanta, K. A., Astawan, I. G., & Jayanta, I. N. L. (2020). Instrumen Penilaian Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Mimbar Ilmu, 25(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v25i2.26

611

Mulyasa, H. E. (2017). Pengembangan dan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nkhoma, C., Nkhoma, M., & Tu, L. K. (2018). Authentic Assessment Design in Accounting Courses: A Literature Review. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 15(July), 157–190. https://doi.org/10.28945/4036

Oktaviani, N. M., & Wulandari, I. (2019). Implementasi Standar Proses dalam Kurikulum 2013 di Sekolah Dasar. Primariy : Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 8(2), 182–189.

http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v8i 2.7960

Alberta Education. (2016). Descriptions & Indicators alberta gov. Government of Alberta. https://education.alberta.ca.

Bell, D. V. J. (2016). Twenty-first century education: Transformative education for sustainability and responsible citizenship. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 18(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes 2016-0004

Cachia, R., & Ferrari, A. (2010). Creativity in Schools : A Survey of Teachers in Europe.

https://doi.org/10.2791/48818

Carlgren, T. (2013). Communication , Critical Thinking , Problem Solving : A Suggested Course for All High School Students. Interchange, 44, 63–81.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-013- 9197-8

Chowdhury, M. (2016). Emphasizing morals , values , ethics , and character education in science education and science teaching. The Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Science, 4(2), 1–16.

Collard, P., & Looney, J. (2014). Nurturing Creativity in Education. European Journal of Education, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12090

Fullan, M., & Scott, G. (2014). New Pedagogies for Deep Learning Whitepaper: Education Plus. Collaborative Impact. www.newpedagogies.org.

Henriksen, D., Mishra, P., & Fisser, P. (2016). Infusing Creativity and Technology in 21st Century Education: A Systemic View for Change. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(3), 27–37.

https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/ jeductechsoci.19.3.27

Lin, A. (2013). Citizenship education in American schools and its role in developing civic engagement : a review of the research. Educational Review, 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.20

13.813440

Miller, B. S. (2015). The 6 C’s Squared Version of Education in the 21st Century. Accretive Media. https://www.bamradionetwork.com

Nkhoma, C., Nkhoma, M., & Tu, L. K. (2018). Authentic Assessment Design in Accounting Courses: A Literature Review. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 15(July), 157–190. https://doi.org/10.28945/4036

Ontario. (2016). Phase 1: Towards Defining 21st Century Competencies for Ontario 21st Century Competencies: Foundation Document for Discussion (Vol. 5). Ontario. http://www.edugains.ca https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2388 7/mi.v27i1.45496

Widyastika, D., & Wahyuni, N. (2022). Pengembangan Penilaian Sikap Ilmiah Berbasis Inkuiri Berorientasi

Pendidikan Karakter Siswa pada Pelajaran IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(6), 9402–9409. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i

6.4087

OXFAM. (2015). Education for Global Citizenship A guide for school. In Teachers College Record. OXFAM GB.

https://doi.org/10.4324/97802038780 40-15

Pala, A. (2011). the Need for Character Education. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanity Studies, 3(2), 23–32.

Prasetyo, T. (2017). Developing Assessment Kits of Learning Outcomes on Thematic-Integrated Learning in Class V of Elementary Schools. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 5(1), 102– 111.

https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21 831/jpe.v5i1.7528

Rahmawan, F. E., Sumaryanto, T., & Supriyadi. (2016). Pengembangan

Instrumen Penilaian Kinerja Kemampuan Bernyanyi Berbasis Android. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 5(1), 81–89.

Riyani, R., Maizora, S., & Hanifah, H. (2017). Uji Validitas Pengembangan Tes Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Pemahaman Relasional Pada Materi Persamaan Kuadrat Siswa Kelas Viii Smp. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), 1(1), 60–65.

https://doi.org/10.33369/jp2ms.1.1.6 0-65

Rudiyanto, A., & Haryanto, S. (2020). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian sikap rasa ingin tahu siswa. Journal of Educational Evaluation Studies (JEES), 1(3), 191–201. http://jurnal.ustjogja.ac.id/index.php/

JEES

Sunendar, D., Darmawangsa, D., & Sukmayadi, V. (2021). Thriving in Indonesian Academia: French Students’ Intercultural Communication Competence in Studying Abroad. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 21(1), 80–91.

https://doi.org/10.36923/jicc.v21i1.7 Utama, A. A. P. A. A. S., Astawan, I. G., & Adi, I. N. R. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Dan Berpikir Kreatif Berbasis Google Form. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Citra Bakti, 9(2), 250– 261.

https://doi.org/10.38048/jipcb.v9i2.6 82

Viranthi, L. P. A., & Wulandari, I. G. A. A. (2022). Instrumen Penilaian Berbasis Karakter Peduli Sosial Materi Keragaman Budaya Muatan IPS Kelas IV. Jurnal Mimbar Ilmu, 27(1), 53–62.