THE PROFILE OF SCHOOL LITERACY MOVEMENT AS AN EFFORT TO INCREASE READING MOTIVATION FOR PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN KABUPATEN BONE

Irma; Sitti Aida Aziz; Sulfasyah

doi:10.33578/jpfkip.v10i3.8200

Authors

Irma Magister Pendidikan Dasar, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia Author
Sitti Aida Aziz Magister Pendidikan Dasar, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia Author
Sulfasyah Magister Pendidikan Dasar, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v10i3.8200

Keywords:

literacy movement, reading motivation

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the implementation of the School Literacy Movement (SLM) program to increase students’ reading motivation at elementary schools in cluster 1 of Kecamatan Tanete Riattang Barat, Kabupaten Bone. This study also aimed to reveal supporting and inhibiting factors in implementing the SLM as well as the strategies developed by schools to overcome these inhibiting factors. This qualitative descriptive study utilized observations, interviews, and documentation to collect the data. The instruments of this study were observation sheets and interview guidelines. The subjects of this study were 15 respondents consisting of the principal, teachers, and grade VI and III students. The results showed that the school implemented the SLM program through habituation, development, and classroom learning activities. This program included the provision of facilities and infrastructure such as libraries, reading corners, reading gardens, wall magazines, posters, and slogans. In addition, the SLM program was supported by the school committee, extra-curricular activities, and the allocation of school funding. Meanwhile, the inhibiting factors included students’ lack of understanding about the implementation of the SLM, the imbalance between library capacity and the number of students, insufficient book collections, and limited time available for reading activities. Thus, strategies to overcome these factors were providing students with an understanding of the SLM, expanding the reading garden, updating the library book collection, and maximizing the use of must-read hours.

References

Antari, D. N., Sundari, N., & Wulan, N. S. (2016). Studi deskriptif minat baca siswa sekolah dasar kelas V di Kota Serang. Antologi UPI, 4(2).

Apriliyanto, R. D., & Sholeh, M. (2019). Strategi kepala sekolah dalam gerakan literasi untuk peningkatan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa di SD Muhammadiyah 15 Surabaya. Inspirasi Manajemen Pendidikan, 7(1).

Aulawi, M. B. (2011). Optimalisasi layanan perpustakaan dalam meningkatkan minat baca siswa. Pustakaloka, 3(1), 117–127.

Berliana, A. O., & Busyairi. (2019). Implementasi gerakan literasi sekolah sebagai penanaman minat baca siswa kelas IV. Joyful Learning Journal, 8(1), 25–30.

Fauziyah, U. S. (2020). Analisis materi pokok Bahasa Indonesia pada buku tematik kelas III MI/SD revisi 2018. EduHumaniora: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 12(2), 91–100.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mulasih, M., & Hudhana, W. D. (2020). Urgensi budaya literasi dan upaya menumbuhkan minat baca. Lingua Rima: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(2), 19–23.

Mumpuni, A., & Nurbaeti, R. U. (2019). Analisa faktor yang mempengaruhi minat baca mahasiswa PGSD. DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik, 3(2), 123–132.

OECD. (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematics, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/publications/pisa2015-assessment-and-analytical-framework-9789264281820-en.htm

OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/pisa-2018-assessment-and-analytical-framework-b25efab8-en.htm

Permendikbud. (2015). Permendikbud No. 23 Tahun 2015 tentang Pengembangan Budi Pekerti. Jakarta: Sekretariat Ditjen Dikdasmen, Kemendikbud.

Rachmawati, T. S., Rohanda, R., & Winoto, Y. (2017). Apresiasi orang tua siswa terhadap program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah (GLS). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP Untirta, 1(2).

Rahayu, S., & Fakhruddin, F. (2019). Manajemen taman bacaan masyarakat (TBM) sebagai upaya meningkatkan budaya literasi. Jurnal Eksistensi Pendidikan Luar Sekolah (E-Plus), 4(2).

Riadi, S. (2019). Metode klos meningkatkan kecepatan efektif membaca (KEM). Media Nusantara: Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 111–117.

Rusminati, S. H., & Rosidah, C. T. (2018). Korelasi penerapan gerakan literasi sekolah (GLS) dengan kemampuan menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika siswa di SDN Kebondalem Mojosari dan SDN Ketabang Surabaya. INVENTA: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2(2), 97–103.

Sa’diyah, Z. (2015). Peningkatkan minat baca siswa di SDI Bani Hasyim Singosari Malang (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim).

Setyawan, D., & Gusdian, R. I. (2020). Penguatan habitus literasi: Sebuah cara pendampingan Tim Literasi Sekolah (TLS). E-DIMAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 11(3), 299–306.

Setyowati, Y. N. (2019). Pengaruh penggunaan metode SQ3R dan motivasi belajar terhadap kemampuan memahami bacaan siswa kelas IV Madrasah Ibtidaiyah se-Kecamatan Sawahan. Linguista: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pembelajarannya, 3(2), 80–90.

Wahyuni, P. D., Djatmika, E. T., & As’ari, A. R. (2018). Pengaruh full day school dan gerakan literasi sekolah terhadap hasil belajar dengan mediasi motivasi belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, dan Pengembangan, 3(5), 679–684.

Widodo, A., Indraswasti, D., Erfan, M., Maulyda, M. A., & Rahmatih, A. N. (2020). Profil minat baca mahasiswa baru PGSD Universitas Mataram. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, 10(1), 34–48.