ANALISIS IMPLEMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN ONLINE PADA MATA PELAJARAN MATEMATIKA JENJANG SEKOLAH DASAR

Sabina Ndiung; Trifonia Atin Statianin; Virgorius Jehadin; Alfonsus Sandrio Norman

doi:10.33578/10.33578/jpfkip.v11i5.9130

Authors

Sabina Ndiung Univeritas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus Ruteng, Indonesia Author
Trifonia Atin Statianin Univeritas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus Ruteng, Indonesia Author
Virgorius Jehadin Univeritas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus Ruteng, Indonesia Author
Alfonsus Sandrio Norman Univeritas Katolik Indonesia Santu Paulus Ruteng, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/10.33578/jpfkip.v11i5.9130

Keywords:

mathematical learning subject, online learning, elementary school students

Abstract

This article describes the teacher's perception of the mathematical learning subject implementation by using the online mode in elementary schools. The research was a quantitative descriptive study by involving ten elementary school teachers as the sample. The research was conducted at ten elementary schools in Macang Pacar, West Manggarai. The data collection technique used a questionnaire, which consisted of 25 questions related to the implementation of online learning in the midst of the Covid-19 pandemic and was tested first to test the validity and reliability of the instrument. Based on the results of the instrument validity test, it was found that the teachers' perception instruments were valid with a reliability coefficient of 0.84 in the high category. The data analysis technique used quantitative-descriptive analysis. The results showed that based on the results of the analysis by respondents on 25 items of questionnaire instruments with three dimensions, they are dimensions of teaching materials with the average of 2.84, the dimensions of students’ interaction with an average of 4.14, and the dimensions of the learning environment with the average of 2.92. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the implementation of online mathematical learning subjects for students in the Macang Pacar West Manggarai was not implemented well. Based on the findings, it is recommended for teachers to apply online learning by considering supporting facilities and infrastructure that could facilitate interactive learning activities by considering the justice principle for the students.

References

Bentley, Y., Selassie, H., & Shegunshi, A. (2012). Design and evaluation of student-focused eLearning. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 10(1), 1–12.

Boon, H. N., & Boon, D. A. (2012). Analyzing Likert data. Journal of Extension, 50(2).

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publication.

Dewayani, T. (2020). Flexible Working Space (FWS) sebagai New Normal Kementerian Keuangan pasca pandemi Covid-19. DJKN-Kemenkeu. https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id

Endah Wulantina, S. M. (2019). Persepsi peserta didik terhadap metode blended learning dengan Google Classroom. Jurnal Inovasi Matematika, 1(2), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.35438/inomatika.v1i2.156

Firman, F., & Rahayu, S. (2020). Pembelajaran online di tengah pandemi Covid-19. Indonesian Journal of Educational Science, 2(2), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.31605/ijes.v2i2.659

Fortune, M. F., Spielman, M., & Pangelinan, D. T. (2011). Students’ perceptions of online or face-to-face learning and social media in hospitality, recreation and tourism. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 1–16.

Hidayat, A., & Sadewa, P. (2020). Pengaruh penggunaan aplikasi Eviews terhadap sikap belajar dan kemampuan pemecahan masalah statistik. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 321–328.

Jamaludin, D., et al. (2020). Pembelajaran daring masa pandemik Covid-19 pada calon guru. Karya Tulis Ilmiah, 2. http://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/30518/

Kemdikbud. (2020). Rencana Strategis Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan 2020–2024. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Kuo, Y. C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001

Menggo, S., Midun, H., & Pandor, P. (2021). Students’ digital literacy competence and English study habits. The 1st International Conference on Education, Humanities, Health, and Agriculture. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.3-6-2021.2310655

Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same? Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001

Permana, G. K., & Daryati, D. (2013). Persepsi siswa dan guru terhadap pelaksanaan pembelajaran berbasis e-learning di SMK Negeri 4 Jakarta. Jurnal PenSil, 2(2), 111–117. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpensil.v2i2.9872

Puspaningtyas, N. D., & Dewi, P. S. (2020). Persepsi peserta didik terhadap pembelajaran berbasis daring. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif (JPMI), 3(6), 703–712. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v3i6.703-712

Radovan, M., & Makovec, D. (2015). Adult learners’ learning environment perceptions and satisfaction in formal education: Case study of four East-European countries. International Education Studies, 8(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n2p101

Rohaendi, S., & Laelasari, N. I. (2020). Penerapan teori Piaget dan Vygotsky ruang lingkup bilangan dan aljabar pada siswa MTs Plus Karangwangi. Prisma, 9(1), 65–76.

Suandito, B. (2017). Bukti informal dalam pembelajaran matematika. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v8i1.1160

Szpunar, K. K., Moulton, S. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2013). Mind wandering and education: From the classroom to online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 495. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00495

Tsaniyah, S. F., Ayu, H. D., & Pratiwi, H. Y. (2019). Pengaruh model blended learning menggunakan Schoology terhadap prestasi belajar ditinjau dari kemandirian belajar siswa. Jurnal Terapan Sains & Teknologi (RAINSTEK), 1(1), 71–77.