Effectiveness of Interactive Learning in Teaching Fraction Concepts to Elementary School Teacher Education Students at UKI Toraja

Authors

  • Topanus Tulak Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja, Indonesia Author https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2237-9093 (unauthenticated)
  • Rubianus Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja, Indonesia Author
  • Harmelia Tulak Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja, Indonesia Author
  • Desi Natalia Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33578/

Keywords:

Interactive Learning, Fraction Concepts, Elementary Teacher Education Students, Conceptual Understanding

Abstract

This study aims to explore the effectiveness of interactive learning in teaching fraction concepts to students of the Elementary School Teacher Education Program at UKI Toraja. A qualitative approach using a case study method was employed to gain an in-depth understanding of students' experiences during the learning process. Data were collected through observations, interviews, and document analysis, and analyzed using Miles and Huberman's interactive model. The findings reveal that interactive approaches promote active student engagement, enhance conceptual understanding, and help address common misconceptions in fractions. These results highlight the importance of contextual, collaborative, and experience-based learning strategies in elementary mathematics education. The study offers implications for designing more meaningful instruction for prospective teachers and contributes to curriculum development based on students' learning needs.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Bruce, C. D., Flynn, T., Yearley, S., & Hawes, Z. (2023). Leveraging Number Lines and Unit Fractions to Built Student Understanding: Insights from a Mixed Methods Study. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 23(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-023-00278-x

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Harvard University Press.

Bush, J. B. (2021). Software-based intervention with digital manipulatives to support student conceptual understandings of fractions. BJET: British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(6), 2299–2318. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13139

Flores, R., Inan, F. A., Han, S., & Koontz, E. (2018). Comparison of algorithmic and multiple-representation integrated instruction for teaching fractions, decimals, and percent. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 11(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/19477503.2018.1461050

Hanggara, Y., Sa’dijah, C., & Qohar, Abd. (2023). Theory and practice of constructive approaches in mathematics learning. JCP (Jurnal Cahaya Pendidikan), 9(1), 27–34. https://doi.org/10.33373/chypend.v9i1.5127

Kaharuddin, A., Tulak, T., Magfirah, I., & Ode, R. (2021). Mengapa Kita Membutuhkan Teknologi Dalam Pendidikan? Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 10(1), 57–61. https://doi.org/10.47178/jkip.v10i1.1279

Mahmudi, M. R., Davidi, E. I. N., & Tulak, T. (2024). Tren Penggunaan Teknologi dalam Pembelajaran Numerasi Di Sekolah Dasar: Analisis Bibliometrik. Elementary Journal: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 7(2), 148–160. https://doi.org/10.47178/hjncz940

Mangalik, A., & Tulak, T. (2019). Penggunaan Alat Peraga Bangun Ruang Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa. Elementary Journal: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2(2), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.47178/elementary.v2i2.857

Ölmez, I. B., & Izsák, A. (2020). Characterizing reasoning about fraction arithmetic of middle grades teachers in three latent classes. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1780368

Park, J., Bryant, D. P., & Shin, M. (2023). Effects of a Synchronous Online Fraction Intervention Using Virtual Manipulatives for Students With Learning Disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 39(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434231195313

Pratama, Muh. P., Sampelolo, R., & Tulak, T. (2023). Mengembangkan Pembelajaran Interaktif dengan Canva Untuk Pendidikan Di SMP. Resona: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Masyarakat, 7(2), 290–297. https://doi.org/10.35906/resona.v7i2.1843

Sampelolo, R., Abdullah, M., Tulak, T., Palayukan, H., Langi, E. L., Tulak, H., Pakiding, A., Pratama, Muh. P., Tangkearung, S. S., & Duma, S. Y. (2024). Buku Pembelajaran Aktif: Teori dan Aplikasi. UKI Toraja Press.

Tulak, H., Tulak, T., & Kiki. (2023). Penerapan Teori Bruner Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik. Prosiding Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja, 3, 142–148. https://doi.org/10.47178/prosidingukit.v3i2.2276

Tulak, T., Rahman, A., & Ahmad, A. (2024). Translational Process of Enactive, Iconic, Symbolic Representastion in Understanding the Concept of Fractions. Himalayan Journal of Education and Literature, 5(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.47310/hjel.2024.v0i503.006

Tulak, T., Rubianus, & Maramba’, S. (2024). Optimizing Mathematics Learning Outcomes Using Artificial Intelligence Technology. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 12(1), 160–170. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2024v12n1a11

Tulak, T., Rubianus, Rianto, W., Stevania, V., & Cindy. (2022). Analysis of Misconception of Elementary School Teacher Study Program UKI Toraja Lectures about Fraction. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 6(2), 1550–1556. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v6i2.4139

Tulak, T., Tangkearung, S. S., Hendrik, & Selin, R. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika. Prosiding Universitas Kristen Indonesia Toraja, 1, 97–106.

Wilkie, K. J., & Roche, A. (2022). Primary teachers’ preferred fractions models and manipulatives for solving fractions tasks and for teching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 26, 703–733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-022-09542-7

Zhang, L., Shang, J., Pelton, T., & Pelton, L. F. (2020). Supporting primary students’ learning of fraction conceptual knowledge through digital games. JCAL: Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(4), 540–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12422

Published

2025-07-28

Issue

Section

Original research