PERBEDAAN MOTIVASI BELAJAR IPS PADA MODEL PEMBELAJARAN CTL DAN EKSPOSITORI SISWA SEKOLAH DASAR

Elpri Darta Putra, Siti Quratul Ain, Eva Astuti Mulyani, Mitha Anggriani

Abstract


This study aimed to determine the difference of students’ learning motivation on CTL learning model and expository learning model. The implementation of CTL and expository learning model was proved to give different effect on the students’ motivation in learning social science subject. This study was quasi-experimental research which did not use a control group. The design of this study was nonequivalent groups pre-test-post-test design. This study was conducted at grade IV SDN 191 Pekanbaru with a total of 45 students. Different learning models significantly influenced the students’ motivation in learning social science. This difference was seen from the average value of the students’ learning motivation in which the average value for expository learning model was 52.72 and the value for CTL model was 79.69. This study also found that the difference value of expository learning model and CTL model towards the students’ motivation was  24.53% while the remaining 74.57% was influenced by other variables.

Keywords


CTL (contextual teaching learning), learning motivation

References


Akdon. (2005). Aplikasi Statistik Metode penelitian. Bandung: Dewa Ruci.

Asri, B. (1999). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Surabaya: Rineka Cipta.

BSE. (2008). Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial untuk SD dan MI Kelas IV. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Dimyati, M. (2006). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djamarah, S.B. (2006). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Hana, P.P. (2018). Penerapan model pembelajaran Kontekstual untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa pada pelajaran IPS di Kelas IV SDN 030 Tampan Pekanbaru. Tidak diterbitkan.

KTSP. (2007). Panduan lengkap KTSP. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Yudhistira

Kunandar. (2008). Guru Profesional implementasi KTSP . Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada..

Alfieri, L. (2011). Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning. International Journal of Educational Psychology American Psychological Association 2011, 103(1), 1–18.

Jamal, M. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Yogjakarta: Diva press.

Ketut, P. (2011). Aplikasi SPSS dalam Penelitian. Jakarta: PT alexmedia kompindo.

Sanjaya, W. (2009). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta:. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sanjaya, W. (2010). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada media.

Sobur, A. (2003). Psikologi Umum. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Mooij, T. (2004). Contextual learning theory form and a improve early education. journal of assisted Learning, 89 (2),133-140

Trianto. (2007). Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivistik. Jakarta: Prestasi pustaka publisher.

Uno, H. B. (2010). Motivasi dan Pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v9i6.8109

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Elpri Darta Putra, Siti Quratul Ain, Eva Astuti Mulyani, Mitha Anggriani

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


____________________________________________________________

Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar

Secretariat
Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar
Gedung B1, FKIP Universitas Riau
Kampus Bina Widya Km. 12,5 Simpang Baru Panam
Pekanbaru Riau Indonesia 28293
e-mail : primary@ejournal.unri.ac.id